ArticleCureus2024
What Is New and Effective in Treating Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia?
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe facial pain disorder characterized by brief, electric shock-like pain triggered by innocuous stimuli, commonly affecting middle-aged women. TN can be classified as classic, secondary, or idiopathic, with the secondary form linked to multiple sclerosis (MS). Treatment typically begins with carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine, but surgical and alternative treatments, including botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A), may be considered for refractory cases. We present the case of a 47-year-old female with secondary progressive MS and refractory TN, initially diagnosed in 2008. Following a history of failed pharmacological and surgical interventions, including microvascular decompression and gamma knife surgery, the patient was admitted to a rehabilitation center for motor, cognitive, and functional recovery. Her severe pain, which did not respond to conventional medication, impaired her participation in rehabilitation, leading to the use of BoNT-A as a new intervention. A total of 100U of BoNT-A was injected subcutaneously across the most painful facial regions, at 1 cm intervals. Following the BoNT-A injection, the patient reported a marked reduction in pain (VAS score reduced from 8-9/10 to 1/10), less frequent exacerbations, and reduced dependence on emergency analgesics. The only adverse effect observed was transient ipsilateral facial paresis (House-Brackmann grade II). This case underscores the potential of BoNT-A as a valuable adjunctive therapy for TN, particularly in complex patients where traditional medical and surgical options have failed. BoNT-A was well-tolerated, providing substantial pain relief with minimal side effects. Despite the absence of standardized guidelines for its use in TN, this case supports its consideration in refractory cases, highlighting the need for further research to optimize dosing and administration techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.