ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating Interleukin-2 and Its Receptors As Indicators of Acute Renal Graft Rejection.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Interleukin-2 (IL-2) is a cytokine that exerts its actions via binding to a variety of interleukin-2 receptors (IL-2R), thereby stimulating T-cell response. Acute renal graft rejection (AR) is known to be mediated by CD8+ T-cells, through the IL-2 pathway. The aim of this study was to determine whether IL-2 and IL-2R could work as prognostic biomarkers of AR. Methods IL-2, IL-2R and Cystatin-C levels were measured in the serum of 50 patients who underwent a kidney transplant, once pre-operatively and at four different time points post-operatively (second, sixth, 14th day and third month). Of the total number of patients, ultimately 10 (20%) had an episode of AR. Results No statistically significant difference in IL-2 levels was found between those who experienced AR and those who did not, at any of the studied time points. On the other hand, measurement of IL-2R levels on the sixth and 14th day post-operatively showed that people with AR had a statistically significant increase in its value compared to patients who did not have an AR episode (p=0.027 and p=0.019, respectively). In addition, comparing the values of IL-2R with that of Cystatin-C in different time periods, it was found that there is a significant positive linear correlation on the second and sixth postoperative day between the values of the associated parameters (r=0.280, p=0.049 and r=0.372, p=0.008 respectively). Conclusion The measurement of IL-2R from the sixth to 14th postoperative day could be used as a reliable prognostic biomarker of AR, however additional studies and standardised diagnostic thresholds are required before the routine clinical application is feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.