ArticleCureus2024
Optimization of Infant Nutrition: Exploring Feeding Practices Among Indian Mothers.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to investigate infant and young child feeding practices in an outpatient setting in India. MATERIAL AND
methodsAbout 103 parents of healthy children aged ≤6 years seeking outpatient pediatric care at an urban tertiary care hospital over one month were included in this observational study. Data regarding feeding practices was collected using a pre-designed and pretested questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA) and Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, USA).
resultThe average age of the study population was 21.26 ±16.561 months. About 45.6% of children were <12 months old. Around 42.7% of children were exclusively breastfed, 21.4% were formula-fed, and 35.9% were mixed-fed. About 49.15% of parents chose formula feeding voluntarily, and 50.85% due to inadequate milk supply. Around 71.2% were recommended by the clinician, 16.9% chose formula based on online information, and 11.9% chose autonomously. Nestle NanPro was the most used formula, followed by Similac Advance, Pediasure Advance, Danone, and NeoSure.
conclusionOur study revealed that most parents adhered to recommended guidelines by exclusively breastfeeding their children, which holds crucial significance in a developing country like India. Parents resorted to formula feeding only when necessary for optimal nutrition. Nestle NanPro was the preferred choice. While most parents demonstrated commendable awareness through growth monitoring and supplementation, there's a crucial need for campaigns to dispel misconceptions and promote proper feeding practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.