ArticleJPRAS open2025
One-Year Quality of Life Outcomes of Delayed Unilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction and Associated Patient Factors.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As breast cancer survival rates improve, the long-term quality of life (QoL) has become increasingly important. With a significant number of patients still undergoing mastectomy and experiencing its well-known negative impacts on QoL, breast reconstruction aims to mitigate this by restoring body integrity. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in QoL and satisfaction in patients after breast reconstruction and influence of various patient-related factors. Methods: Patients who underwent delayed unilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) breast reconstruction at a single institution between January 2016 and April 2019 were surveyed. QoL was assessed using the BREAST-Q questionnaire preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Scores were compared between the time points, and regression analysis was conducted to identify the influence of age, body mass index, economic status, education level, and relationship status on QoL. Results: Among the 93 patients, 55 completed the preoperative and one-year postoperative BREAST-Q questionnaires (response rate: 59%). Postoperative QoL scores significantly increased for the domains "satisfaction with breasts," physical well-being chest," "sexual well-being," and "psychosocial well-being" (p<0.001). The scores for the domain "physical well-being abdomen" remained unchanged one year postoperatively. Higher education correlated with greater satisfaction with the breasts. Lack of an intimate partnership was identified as a significant negative factor for poorer psychosocial well-being. Conclusions: Delayed unilateral DIEP breast reconstruction significantly enhances QoL and breast satisfaction one year postoperatively without causing long-term physical discomfort at the donor site. Education level and relationship status significantly affect the postoperative outcomes. Tailored preoperative counseling and psychosocial support are essential to maximize patient satisfaction and well-being following reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.