Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650793›Full record

ArticleJBJS essential surgical techniques

Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Acetabular Labrum Using an Autograft Hip Capsule.

Bilal S Siddiq, Stephen M Gillinov, Nathan J Cherian, Scott D Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBJS essential surgical techniques. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bilal S SiddiqSports Medicine Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1956-1006
Stephen M GillinovSports Medicine Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5630-4079
Nathan J CherianSports Medicine Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1524-3908
Scott D MartinSports Medicine Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1263-5014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Whereas uncomplicated labral tears with preserved fibers can be effectively treated with use of labral repair techniques, complex tears and hypoplastic labra require labral reconstruction Description: Following induction of anesthesia and appropriate patient positioning, puncture capsulotomy is performed to enter the hip joint Alternatives: Labral reconstruction options include autografts or allografts7. Potential allografts include the semitendinosus, tibialis anterior, iliotibial band, tensor fasciae latae, and peroneus brevis8-14. Remote autograft sites include the gracilis and quadriceps tendons16,17. These options are limited by increased donor site morbidity and operative time to obtain the grafts. Local autograft sites include the ligamentum teres, indirect head of the rectus femoris, iliotibial band, and hip capsule15,18-23,25. Rationale: Relative to autografts, the allografts most commonly utilized in labral reconstruction feature a heightened risk of disease transmission, increased cost, and a potentially lengthened time to graft incorporation Expected Outcomes: Labral reconstruction with capsular augmentation from the hip capsule showed significant improvement over baseline in functional outcomes at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively in patients with complex labral tears that could not be treated with simple repair. Additionally, at 24 months postoperatively, 76.3%, 65.5%, and 60.8% of patient International Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) scores exceeded threshold values for the minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptom state, and substantial clinical benefit, respectively Important Tips: For large cam lesions, 3D computed tomography is performed during preoperative planning.The anterolateral portal should be placed under fluoroscopic guidance with use of the intra-articular fluid-distention technique in order to minimize the risk of iatrogenic injury to the labrum and/or articular cartilage of the joint.The amount of capsular tissue to be elevated is determined by the extent of labral damage.When elevating the capsular tissue, meticulous care is required to preserve the blood supply to the capsule and labrum.Final suture tiedown is performed with no traction applied, which assures an in-round repair and restores the labral suction seal.Intermittent traction is utilized to minimize the risk of nerve palsies. No traction is applied for prepping and draping, bone marrow aspirate harvesting, suture tie-down, or femoral neck osteoplasty. Minimal traction is applied for capsular elevation, acetabuloplasty, anchor placement, and suture tensioning.Our approach utilizes the puncture capsulotomy technique, which was shown in a previous study of 163 patients to have zero risk of common arthroplasty complications, such as microinstability and revision for capsular plication Acronyms and Abbreviations: FAI = femoroacetabular impingementITB = iliotibial bandTFL = tensor fasciae lataeLT = ligamentum teresiHOT-33 = International Hip Outcome Tool-33MCID = minimal clinically important differencePASS = patient acceptable symptom stateSCB = substantial clinical benefitCT = computed tomographyAP = anteroposteriorMRI = magnetic resonance imagingASIS = anterior superior iliac spineBMAC = bone marrow aspirate concentrateDVT = deep vein thrombosis.

Identifiers

PMID39650793
PMCPMC11617351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.