ArticleGenome integrity2024
Androgen Receptor Influenced Recurrence Score Correlation in Hormone Positive and HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Indian Patients: A Comparative Approach.
Article in Genome integrity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) recurrence is a major concern for both patients and healthcare providers. Accurately predicting the risk of BC recurrence can help guide treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes for a disease-free survival. There are several approaches and models that have been developed to predict BC recurrence risk. These include derived clinical assays such as genetic profiling (Oncotye Dx, MammaPrint, CanAssist and others), and algorithm derived open access tools such as Magee equations (ME), CTS5 Calculator and Predict Breast cancer. All the clinical assays are well accepted, but affordability and feasibility remain the challenge due to a noteworthy price tag of USD 3000. As per The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) updates, open access tools are possible substitutes but the availability of limited information on their applicability is a concern. These tools take into consideration the histopathologic parameters and immunohistochemistry (IHC) biomarkers data for estrogen receptor/progesterone (ER/PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67. The current study focuses on the application of these tools in a subset of 55 Indian BC patients considering the influence of the androgen receptor (AR) IHC expression profile. AR is a potent target and a close interacting neighbor protein to ER and available literature also suggests their crosstalk expression in BC clinical models. Our comparative recurrence scores (RSs) predictive data showed a statistically significant AR expression correlation with average ME scores. No significance was noted across different prediction tools. The findings are suggestive that ME predictive scores are more relevant and informative compared to other online tools and with an additional AR IHC expression analysis the recurrence prediction might prove to be beneficial and feasible to many deprived BC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.