Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650720›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2024

Measurable progression of giant cell tumour of bone associated with pregnancy - A tertiary sarcoma centre analysis.

R D Henderson, K Shirodkar, M Hussein, N Jenko, L Jeys, R Botchu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R D HendersonDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
K ShirodkarDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
M HusseinDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
N JenkoDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
L JeysDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
R BotchuDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a benign but locally aggressive bone tumour with a higher predilection for females of reproductive age. GCTB management poses a unique set of challenges during pregnancy due to risks associated with imaging and treatment options. Pregnancy has been implicated in GCTB progression and tumour recurrence, however an exact mechanism has not been established. This study aims to confirm the relationship between the diagnosis and progression of GCTB during pregnancy. Methods: A 17-year retrospective analysis of our tertiary sarcoma referral centre database was performed to identify the relevant patients. Pregnancy-associated tumours were defined by those already present or diagnosed during pregnancy, and up to 12 months postpartum. Lesion volume was determined by mathematical ellipsoidal modelling technique to simplify the estimation, with cross-sectional measurements obtained from the three standard orthogonal planes on initial and surveillance imaging. Due to logistical challenges, follow-up imaging was performed at either our tertiary sarcoma centre or under guidance at regional imaging centres convenient to the patient. Results: The diagnosis of GCTB was made in 113 female patients during this 17-year period, of which 20 were associated with pregnancy with a mean age of 28.8 years (range 19-40 years). 12 patients had their primary or recurrent GCTB diagnosed, or known tumour progress during pregnancy, whilst the remaining 8 were diagnosed shortly thereafter to within 12 months postpartum. The most common tumour sites were located around the knee (30 %) and distal radius (25 %). A statistically significant pattern of growth was observed through the surveillance period (p 0.018), within a relatively short mean follow-up period of only 89.8 days (SD 54.5; 13-192 days). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the significant association that pregnancy has with the growth and progression of both primary and recurrent GCTB. Pregnant patients should be subject to close surveillance well into the postpartum period due to possible accelerated disease progression and potential for disease recurrence.

Indexed as

Giant cell tumour of boneHormonal influencePostpartumPregnancyProgressionRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39650720
PMCPMC11617685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.