Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650691›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in infectious disease

Pre-exposure prophylaxis access, uptake and usage by young people: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators.

Sarah Warzywoda, James A Fowler, Amalie Dyda, Lisa Fitzgerald, Amy B Mullens, Judith A Dean

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Perceptions and Acceptability of Doxycycline-Based STI Prophylaxis: Insights from Consumers and Healthcare Providers in Queensland.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah WarzywodaSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9149-1962
James A FowlerSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Amalie DydaSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Lisa FitzgeraldSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Amy B MullensSchool of Psychology & Wellbeing, Centre for Health Research, Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Judith A DeanSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Young people's sexual health decision-making, including decisions to access and adhere to HIV prevention strategies such as Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), are influenced by a range of internal and external factors. Synthesizing these factors is essential to guide the development of youth-focused PrEP health promotion strategies to contribute to international goals of ending HIV transmission. Objective: To understand the individual, interpersonal, sociocultural and systemic barriers and facilitators to PrEP access, uptake and use experienced by young people 24 years and younger. Design: A systematic review that adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. Data Sources and Methods: Eight databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Medline, CINAHL, JBI, EMBASE, Web of Science) were systematically searched using terms related to young people, HIV and PrEP use. A narrative synthesis approach was used to delineate key barriers and facilitators to PrEP access, uptake and use. Results: Of 11,273 returned articles, 32 met the eligibility criteria for inclusion: 18 from the United States, 10 from African nations and two from Brazil. Barriers and facilitators to PrEP access, uptake and use experienced by young people were identified across intrapersonal, interpersonal, community and systems levels. These factors are described under four overarching themes that relate to knowledge, side effects and perceptions of risk; attitudes and perceptions of family and partners; community attitudes and stigma; and negative healthcare provider experiences and difficulties navigating complex costly healthcare systems. Conclusion: Findings suggest individual-level factors need consideration alongside the impacts of healthcare systems and broader systemic sociocultural structures within young people's relationships when developing PrEP health promotion strategies and services. Without considering these wider external implications to access, uptake and use of PrEP, global targets towards the elimination of HIV transmission will likely remain out of reach. Registration: This review was registered with Prospero (CRD42022296550).

Indexed as

HIVHIV preventionpre-exposure prophylaxisyoung people

Identifiers

PMID39650691
PMCPMC11624559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.