ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Developing Microsurgery Skills Outside of the Operating Room.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding the Role of Robot-assisted Microsurgery: Implementation, Challenges, and Outlook From a High-volume Tertiary Care Center.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Deliberate practice: The cornerstone of microsurgical therapy.Clinical advances in periodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The complex skills required to perform microsurgery are primarily taught in the high-stakes environment of the operating room. However, learners would benefit from developing these abilities in lower-stakes environments beforehand, allowing them to focus on higher-level tasks intraoperatively. This article outlines available resources for developing microsurgical skills outside the operating room and evaluates their alignment with best practices for performance enhancement, thereby identifying ways to improve microsurgical education. Methods: A systematic review and web search were performed in April 2024 to identify available microsurgical skills courses. Descriptive data were extracted from these resources, including course objectives, unique features, model used, and curriculum. Results: Literature and web search revealed 7 online video courses addressing microsurgical skill development. These had freely available multimedia content and used low-fidelity models with widely accessible materials. Six offered a curriculum. By contrast, 14 in-person flap and microsurgery courses in the United States were identified. These occurred over 2-5 days, cost thousands of dollars, and used high-fidelity models with guidance from experts. Finally, there were many simulation platforms ranging from low-fidelity synthetic models to cadaveric tissue to high-fidelity live animal models. These also encompassed technology-based practices such as virtual reality. Conclusions: Compared with high-fidelity training, low-fidelity models are more affordable, are reusable, and allow for dedicated educational opportunities that are better aligned with best practices for knowledge and skill acquisition. Consequently, they have the potential to reach a broader range of trainees and accelerate the learning curve, and therefore should be integrated into every microsurgery training program.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.