ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Temporal Incision Super-high Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Face Lift for Chinese Patients.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical Correction of the Nasolabial Fold: A Critical Review of Rhytidectomy Techniques.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This investigation assessed patient satisfaction with a temporal incision technique using a super-high superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flap for midface lifting in a Chinese patient cohort. Methods: From July 2019 to July 2023, 95 patients underwent midface lifts via a temporal incision approach at our institution. The extent of SMAS flap dissection spanned 2 cm above the outer canthus, to the lower margin of the zygomatic arch inferiorly, and medially to the zygomaticus major muscle. The technique involved anchoring the elevated SMAS flap to the deep temporal fascia to elevate the malar fat pads, correct sagging tissues, and ameliorate the appearance of nasolabial folds. Results: Among the 95 patients, 61 completed a follow-up ranging from 6 months to 2 years postsurgery, with a majority reporting satisfaction with the aesthetic results of their midface lift. No significant complications, including permanent facial nerve injury, were reported. Conclusions: The temporal incision super-high SMAS face lift technique demonstrated high patient satisfaction and clinical effectiveness in improving the appearance of nasolabial fold and midface aesthetics. However, the success of this technique hinges on a comprehensive understanding of facial anatomy due to the confined operative field, highlighting its technical demands and the need for surgical expertise.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.