Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650659›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024

A review focuses on a neglected and controversial component of SCI: myelin debris.

Yuchen Zhou, Tao Xu, Yiyan Zhou, Wei Han, Zhengchao Wu, Changwei Yang, Xiaoqing Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuchen ZhouDepartment of Spine Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Tao XuMedical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Yiyan ZhouDepartment of Spine Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Wei HanInstitute of Regenerative Biology and Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Zhengchao WuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Changwei YangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Xiaoqing ChenDepartment of Spine Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myelin sheath, as the multilayer dense structure enclosing axons in humans and other higher organisms, may rupture due to various injury factors after spinal cord injury, thus producing myelin debris. The myelin debris contains a variety of myelin-associated inhibitors (MAIs) and lipid, all inhibiting the repair after spinal cord injury. Through summary and analysis, the present authors found that the inhibition of myelin debris can be mainly divided into two categories: firstly, the direct inhibition mediated by MAIs; secondly, the indirect inhibition mediated by lipid such as cholesterol. It is worth noting that phagocytes are required in the latter indirect inhibition, such as professional phagocytes (macrophages et al.) and non-professional phagocytes (astrocytes et al.). Moreover, complement and the immune system also participate in the phagocytosis of myelin debris, working together with phagocytes to aggravate spinal cord injury. In conclusion, this paper focuses on the direct and indirect effects of myelin debris on spinal cord injury, aiming to provide new inspiration and reflection for the basic research of spinal cord injury and the conception of related treatment.

Indexed as

Myelin SheathPhagocytosisSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsHumansPhagocytesaxoncholesterolfoam cellmyelin-associated inhibitorsmyelin debrisspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID39650659
PMCPMC11621000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.