Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650588›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of palliative care

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Use of Metoclopramide and Haloperidol on Morphine-induced Nausea and Vomiting in Cancer Patients: A Comparative, Randomised, Prospective Study.

Yogendra Singhal, Surendra Kumar Pingoliya, Sreeharsh Saji, R Pavan Gaurav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of palliative care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yogendra SinghalDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Surendra Kumar PingoliyaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Sreeharsh SajiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
R Pavan GauravDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0389-4797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Morphine is the cornerstone of pain management in a palliative care setting. Nausea with or without vomiting usually occurs when patients are initiated on morphine for the 1 Materials and Methods: A total of 90 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated into two groups of 45 each. Group M received a tablet of metoclopramide 10 mg orally 3 times a day; Group H received a tablet of haloperidol (2.5 mg) orally at night. All the patients were provided NCI CTCAE V4.3 NAUSEA AND VOMITING SCALE and asked to mark their response from day 1 to day 7. At the follow-up visit on the 7 Results: In Group M and Group H, the mean nausea score was between 1 and 2 and the difference was statistically insignificant. In Group M, the maximum vomiting score was 1.28 on day 5, while in Group H, the maximum score was 2 on day 5. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Conclusion: Metoclopramide and haloperidol are equally efficacious in preventing nausea, but metoclopramide was found to be more effective with lesser side effects than haloperidol for morphine-induced vomiting in cancer patients when used prophylactically.

Indexed as

HaloperidolMetoclopramideMorphineNauseaVomiting

Identifiers

PMID39650588
PMCPMC11618674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.