ArticleIndian journal of palliative care
A Prospective Longitudinal Study to Demonstrate the Utility of the Palliative Prognostic Index in Forecasting the Short-term Survival of Patients with Advanced Cancer in India.
Article in Indian journal of palliative care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- End-of-life prognostic models in advanced cancer: a scoping review of model development, validation, and impact.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: In this study, our primary objectives were to validate the palliative prognostic index (PPI) tool in the context of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. Specifically, we aimed to assess the accuracy of the PPI in predicting actual survival in these patients through prospective validation. Materials and Methods: To achieve our objectives, we enrolled a cohort of 227 advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care. The study population comprised 132 (58.1%) men and 95 (41.9%) women, with a median age of 52 years (Range: 20-81). Among them, 56 (24.7%) underwent chemotherapy, and 26 (11.5%) underwent palliative radiotherapy. We utilised the PPI score to categorise patients into three prognostic groups: (a) PPI score <4 indicating likely survival of more than 6 weeks; (b) PPI score 4-6 indicating likely survival shorter than 6 weeks; and (c) PPI score >6 indicating likely survival <3 weeks. Results: Through our analysis, we found that the PPI demonstrated limited predictive capabilities, particularly for short-term survival (<3 weeks). The PPI's performance metrics included a positive predictive value of 45.24%, a negative predictive value of 100%, a sensitivity of 100.00% and a specificity of 88.94%. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study establishes the limited reliability of the PPI in predicting short-term survival (<3 weeks) among patients in palliative care with advanced cancer. These findings underscore the PPI's potential as a valuable tool for healthcare professionals, aiding in the development of treatment plans and facilitating discussions on end-of-life care options with patients and their families. In addition, the PPI may assist healthcare professionals in identifying individuals who could benefit from more aggressive interventions or those approaching the end of life, thereby guiding the provision of additional support and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.