Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650567›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Evaluating a Foundation Artificial Intelligence Model for Glaucoma Detection Using Color Fundus Photographs.

Benton Chuter, Justin Huynh, Shahin Hallaj, Evan Walker, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Massimo A Fazio, Christopher A Girkin, Robert N Weinreb, Mark Christopher, Linda M Zangwill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current Trends in AI and Eye Disease Diagnostics.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Benton ChuterHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Justin HuynhHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Shahin HallajHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Evan WalkerHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Jeffrey M LiebmannBernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Harkness Eye Institute, New York, New York.
Massimo A FazioDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Christopher A GirkinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Robert N WeinrebHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Mark ChristopherHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Linda M ZangwillHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.

Funding

UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001442 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S, HOGARTH, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2024
$88.3M
Bridge2AI:Salutogenesis Data Generation ProjectOT2OD032644 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAXTER, SALLY LIU, CHUTE, CHRISTOPHER G · 2022 to 2025
$32.7M
Vision BiostatisticsP30EY022589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SONIA JAIN · 2012 to 2026
$10.3M
xADAGES III: Contribution of genotype to glaucoma phenotype in African AmericansR01EY023704 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ROTTER, JEROME I, WEINREB, ROBERT N · 2013 to 2017
$6.3M
Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS): High Myopia and Advanced DiseaseR01EY027510 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LINDA M ZANGWILL · 2017 to 2026
$5.3M
Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Career Development K12 ProgramK12EY024225 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WEINREB, ROBERT N · 2015 to 2025
$4.3M
Diagnosis and Monitoring of Glaucoma with Optical Coherence Tomography AngiographyR01EY029058 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WEINREB, ROBERT N · 2018 to 2024
$4.2M
African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation (ADAGES) II: Glaucoma ProgressionR01EY019869 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZANGWILL, LINDA M · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
Age-related changes in optic nerve head structure and biomechanicsR01EY018926 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DOWNS, J CRAWFORD, GIRKIN, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY · 2008 to 2015
$2.6M
African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation (ADAGES) IV: Alterations of the lamina cribrosa in progressionR01EY026574 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FAZIO, MASSIMO ANTONIO, GIRKIN, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY · 2017 to 2020
$2.6M
iGLAMOUR Study: Innovations in Glaucoma Adherence and monitoring Of Under-Represented minoritiesR01MD014850 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI COLEMAN, TODD P, WEINREB, ROBERT N · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
Multimodal Artificial Intelligence to Predict Glaucomatous Progression and Surgical InterventionR01EY034146 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BAXTER, SALLY LIU, CHRISTOPHER, MARK · 2022 to 2025
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001442NEI NIH HHS K12 EY024225NEI NIH HHS K99 EY030942NEI NIH HHS P30 EY022589NEI NIH HHS R00 EY030942NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018926NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019869NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023704NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026574NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027510NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028284NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029058NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034146NEI NIH HHS R41 EY034424NIH HHS OT2 OD032644NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD014850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate RETFound, a foundation artificial intelligence model, using a diverse clinical research dataset to assess its accuracy in detecting glaucoma using optic disc photographs. The model's accuracy for glaucoma detection was evaluated across race, age, glaucoma severity, and various training cycles (epochs) and dataset sample sizes. Design: Evaluation of a diagnostic technology. Participants: The study included 9787 color fundus photographs (CFPs) from 2329 participants of diverse race (White [73.4%], Black [13.6%] and other [13%]), disease severity (21.8% mild glaucoma, 7.2% moderate or advanced glaucoma, 60.3% not glaucoma, and 10.7% unreported), and age (48.8% <60 years, 51.1% >60 years) from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study. All fundus photographs were graded as "Glaucomatous" or "Non-glaucomatous." Methods: The study employed RETFound, a self-supervised learning model, to perform binary glaucoma classification. The diagnostic accuracy of RETFound was iteratively tested across different combinations of dataset sample sizes (50-2000 optic disc photographs), training cycles (5-50), and study subpopulations stratified by severity of glaucoma, age, and race). Main Outcome Measures: Diagnostic accuracy area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for classifying CFP as "Glaucomatous" or "Non-glaucomatous." Results: Performance increased with larger training datasets and more training cycles, improving from 50 training images and 5 epochs (AUC: 0.52) to 2000 training images and 50 epochs (AUC: 0.86), with reduced gain in performance from approximately 500 and 1000 training images (AUC of 0.82 and 0.83, respectively). Performance was consistent across race and age for all training size and cycle number combinations: Black (AUC = 0.87) vs. other (AUC = 0.86), and >60 years (AUC = 0.84) vs. <60 years (AUC = 0.87). Performance was significantly higher in patients with moderate to severe vs. mild glaucoma (AUC = 0.95 vs. 0.84, respectively). Conclusions: Good RETFound performance was observed with a relatively small sample size of optic disc photographs used for fine-tuning and across differences in race and age. RETFound's ability to adapt across a range of CFP training conditions and populations suggests it is a promising tool to automate glaucoma detection in a variety of use cases. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceFundus photographsGlaucomaRETFoundSelf-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39650567
PMCPMC11625234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.