ArticleOphthalmology science
Evaluating a Foundation Artificial Intelligence Model for Glaucoma Detection Using Color Fundus Photographs.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Trends in AI and Eye Disease Diagnostics.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- Improving Generalization of Deep Learning for Glaucoma Classification Under Real-World Domain Shift via Unsupervised Domain Adaptation.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- FunduSegmenter: Leveraging the RETFound Foundation Model for Joint Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation in Retinal Fundus Images.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- A Novel Multimodal Implementation of a Foundation Artificial Intelligence Model Using Optic Nerve Head Fundus Photographs and OCT Imaging for Glaucoma Detection.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Comparison of RETFound and a Supervised Convolutional Neural Network for Detection of Referable Glaucoma from Fundus Photographs.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- DINO-EYE: self-supervised learning for identification of different optic disc phenotypes in primary open angle glaucoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Performance of General-Purpose Vision Language Models and Ophthalmology Foundation Models in Glaucoma Detection and Function Prediction.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Foundation models in ophthalmology: a preliminary study on AI-assisted diagnosis of myopic maculopathy and posterior staphyloma using ultra-widefield fundus images.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Foundation and Supervised Learning-Based Models for Detection of Referable Glaucoma from Fundus Photographs.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Optic Nerve Imaging-From Disc Photos to OCT.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaReview
- A Practical Guide to Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Imaging Models in Scientific Literature.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate RETFound, a foundation artificial intelligence model, using a diverse clinical research dataset to assess its accuracy in detecting glaucoma using optic disc photographs. The model's accuracy for glaucoma detection was evaluated across race, age, glaucoma severity, and various training cycles (epochs) and dataset sample sizes. Design: Evaluation of a diagnostic technology. Participants: The study included 9787 color fundus photographs (CFPs) from 2329 participants of diverse race (White [73.4%], Black [13.6%] and other [13%]), disease severity (21.8% mild glaucoma, 7.2% moderate or advanced glaucoma, 60.3% not glaucoma, and 10.7% unreported), and age (48.8% <60 years, 51.1% >60 years) from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study. All fundus photographs were graded as "Glaucomatous" or "Non-glaucomatous." Methods: The study employed RETFound, a self-supervised learning model, to perform binary glaucoma classification. The diagnostic accuracy of RETFound was iteratively tested across different combinations of dataset sample sizes (50-2000 optic disc photographs), training cycles (5-50), and study subpopulations stratified by severity of glaucoma, age, and race). Main Outcome Measures: Diagnostic accuracy area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for classifying CFP as "Glaucomatous" or "Non-glaucomatous." Results: Performance increased with larger training datasets and more training cycles, improving from 50 training images and 5 epochs (AUC: 0.52) to 2000 training images and 50 epochs (AUC: 0.86), with reduced gain in performance from approximately 500 and 1000 training images (AUC of 0.82 and 0.83, respectively). Performance was consistent across race and age for all training size and cycle number combinations: Black (AUC = 0.87) vs. other (AUC = 0.86), and >60 years (AUC = 0.84) vs. <60 years (AUC = 0.87). Performance was significantly higher in patients with moderate to severe vs. mild glaucoma (AUC = 0.95 vs. 0.84, respectively). Conclusions: Good RETFound performance was observed with a relatively small sample size of optic disc photographs used for fine-tuning and across differences in race and age. RETFound's ability to adapt across a range of CFP training conditions and populations suggests it is a promising tool to automate glaucoma detection in a variety of use cases. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.