Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650529›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Design of judicial public opinion supervision and intelligent decision-making model based on Bi-LSTM.

Heng Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Heng GuoCollege of Humanities, Law and Foreign Languages, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fuzzy preference modeling in intelligent decision support systems aims to improve the efficiency and accuracy of decision-making processes by incorporating fuzzy logic and preference modeling techniques. While network public opinion (NPO) has the potential to drive judicial reform and progress, it also poses challenges to the independence of the judiciary due to the negative impact of malicious public opinion. To tackle this issue within the context of intelligent decision support systems, this study provides an insightful overview of current NPO monitoring technologies. Recognizing the complexities associated with handling large-scale NPO data and mitigating significant interference, a novel judicial domain NPO monitoring model is proposed, which centers around semantic feature analysis. This model takes into account time series characteristics, binary semantic fitting, and public sentiment intensity. Notably, it leverages a bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) network (S-Bi-LSTM) to construct a judicial domain semantic similarity calculation model. The semantic similarity values between sentences are obtained through the utilization of a fully connected layer. Empirical evaluations demonstrate the remarkable performance of the proposed model, achieving an accuracy rate of 85.9% and an F1 value of 87.1 on the test set, surpassing existing sentence semantic similarity models. Ultimately, the proposed model significantly enhances the monitoring capabilities of judicial authorities over NPO, thereby alleviating the burden on public relations faced by judicial institutions and fostering a more equitable execution of judicial power.

Indexed as

Bi-LSTMJudicial domainNPOSemantic featuresSupervise

Identifiers

PMID39650529
PMCPMC11623130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.