ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
LocustLens: leveraging environmental data fusion and machine learning for desert locust swarm prediction.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Evolution of Modeling Approaches: From Statistical Models to Deep Learning for Locust and Grasshopper Forecasting.Insects · 2026Review
- Research on the construction of an AI diagnostic model for plus disease of retinopathy of prematurity based on cross-center fusion datasets.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The desert locust is one of the most destructive locusts recorded in human history, and it has caused significant food shortages, monetary losses, and environmental calamities. Prediction of locust attacks is complicated as it depends on various environmental and geographical factors. This research aims to develop a machine-learning model for predicting desert locust attacks in 42 countries that considers three predictors: soil moisture, maximum temperature, and precipitation. We developed the Global Locust Attack Database for 42 countries (GLAD42) by integrating TerraClimate's environmental data with locust swarm attack data from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). To improve the usability of spatial data, reverse geocoding which is the process of converting geographic coordinates (longitude and latitude) into human-readable location names (such as countries and regions) was employed. This step enhances the clarity and interpretability of the data by providing meaningful geographic context. This study's initial dataset focused on instances where locust attacks were recorded (positive class). To ensure a comprehensive analysis, we also incorporated negative class instances, representing periods (specific years and months) in the same countries and regions where locust attacks did not occur. This research utilizes the benefits of lazy learners by employing the K-nearest neighbor algorithm (K-NN), which provides high accuracy and the benefit of no time-consuming retraining even if real-time updated data is periodically added to the system. This research also focuses on building an eco-friendly machine learning model by evaluating carbon emissions from ML models. The results obtained from LocustLens are compared with other machine learning models, including baseline-K-NN, decision trees (DT), Logistic regression (LR), AdaBoost Classifier, BaggingClassifier, and support vector classifier (SVC). LocustLens outperformed all competitors with an accuracy of 98%, while baseline-K-NN achieved 96%, SVC gave 91%, DT gave 97%, AdaBoost has accuracy of 91%, BaggingClassifier gave 94% and LR gave 83%, respectively. Carbon emissions from RAM and CPU electricity consumption are measured in kg gCO2. They are a minimum for AdaBoost Classifier equal to 0.02 and 0.07 for DT and a maximum of 9.03 for SVC. The carbon footprint of LocustLens is 4.87 kg gCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.