Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650514›Full record

ReviewPeerJ. Computer science2024

A systematic review on artificial intelligence approaches for smart health devices.

Lerina Aversano, Martina Iammarino, Ilaria Mancino, Debora Montano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lerina AversanoDepartment of Agricultural Science, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2436-6835
Martina IammarinoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8025-733X
Ilaria MancinoDepartment of Engineering, University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy.
Debora MontanoCeRICT scrl-Regional Center Information Communication Technology, Benevento, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of smart health, the use of wearable Internet of Things (IoT) devices is becoming increasingly popular to monitor and manage patients' health conditions in a more efficient and personalized way. However, choosing the most suitable artificial intelligence (AI) methodology to analyze the data collected by these devices is crucial to ensure the reliability and effectiveness of smart healthcare applications. Additionally, protecting the privacy and security of health data is an area of growing concern, given the sensitivity and personal nature of such information. In this context, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) are emerging as successful technologies because they are suitable for application to advanced analysis and prediction of healthcare scenarios. Therefore, the objective of this work is to contribute to the current state of the literature by identifying challenges, best practices, and future opportunities in the field of smart health. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the AI methodologies used, the neural network architectures adopted, and the algorithms employed, as well as examine the privacy and security issues related to the management of health data collected by wearable IoT devices. Through this systematic review, we aim to offer practical guidelines for the design, development, and implementation of AI solutions in smart health, to improve the quality of care provided and promote patient well-being. To pursue our goal, several articles focusing on ML or DL network architectures were selected and reviewed. The final discussion highlights research gaps yet to be investigated, as well as the drawbacks and vulnerabilities of existing IoT applications in smart healthcare.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceSmart healthWearable devices

Identifiers

PMID39650514
PMCPMC11623213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.