Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650498›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Automated lesion detection in cotton leaf visuals using deep learning.

Frnaz Akbar, Yassine Aribi, Syed Muhammad Usman, Hamzah Faraj, Ahmed Murayr, Fawaz Alasmari, Shehzad Khalid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Frnaz AkbarDepartment of Creative Technologies, Faculty of Computing and AI, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Yassine AribiDepartment of Science and Technology, College of Ranyah, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Syed Muhammad UsmanDepartment of Computer Science, Bahria School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hamzah FarajDepartment of Science and Technology, College of Ranyah, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed MurayrDepartment of Science and Technology, College of Ranyah, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Fawaz AlasmariDepartment of Science and Technology, College of Ranyah, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Shehzad KhalidDepartment of Computer Engineering, Bahria School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cotton is one of the major cash crop in the agriculture led economies across the world. Cotton leaf diseases affects its yield globally. Determining cotton lesions on leaves is difficult when the area is big and the size of lesions is varied. Automated cotton lesion detection is quite useful; however, it is challenging due to fewer disease class, limited size datasets, class imbalance problems, and need of comprehensive evaluation metrics. We propose a novel deep learning based method that augments the data using generative adversarial networks (GANs) to reduce the class imbalance issue and an ensemble-based method that combines the feature vector obtained from the three deep learning architectures including VGG16, Inception V3, and ResNet50. The proposed method offers a more precise, efficient and scalable method for automated detection of diseases of cotton crops. We have implemented the proposed method on publicly available dataset with seven disease and one health classes and have achieved highest accuracy of 95% and F-1 score of 98%. The proposed method performs better than existing state of the art methods.

Indexed as

CNNCotton disease detectionDeep learningFeature fusionPrecision agriculture

Identifiers

PMID39650498
PMCPMC11623137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.