ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
HierbaNetV1: a novel feature extraction framework for deep learning-based weed identification.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracting the essential features and learning the appropriate patterns are the two core character traits of a convolution neural network (CNN). Leveraging the two traits, this research proposes a novel feature extraction framework code-named 'HierbaNetV1' that retrieves and learns effective features from an input image. Originality is brought by addressing the problem of varying-sized region of interest (ROI) in an image by extracting features using diversified filters. For every input sample, 3,872 feature maps are generated with multiple levels of complexity. The proposed method integrates low-level and high-level features thus allowing the model to learn intensive and diversified features. As a follow-up of this research, a crop-weed research dataset termed 'SorghumWeedDataset_Classification' is acquired and created. This dataset is tested on HierbaNetV1 which is compared against pre-trained models and state-of-the-art (SOTA) architectures. Experimental results show HierbaNetV1 outperforms other architectures with an accuracy of 98.06%. An ablation study and component analysis are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of HierbaNetV1. Validated against benchmark weed datasets, the study also exhibits that our suggested approach performs well in terms of generalization across a wide variety of crops and weeds. To facilitate further research, HierbaNetV1 weights and implementation are made accessible to the research community on GitHub. To extend the research to practicality, the proposed method is incorporated with a real-time application named HierbaApp that assists farmers in differentiating crops from weeds. Future enhancements for this research are outlined in this article and are currently underway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.