Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650492›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

A comprehensive review of gait analysis using deep learning approaches in criminal investigation.

Sai Thu Ya Aung, Worapan Kusakunniran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic image and video analysis, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sai Thu Ya AungFaculty of Information and Communication Technology, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Worapan KusakunniranFaculty of Information and Communication Technology, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing worries expressed by privacy supporters about the extensive adoption of gait biometrics, research in this field has been moving forward swiftly. Deep learning, a powerful technology that enables computers to learn from data, has found its way into criminal investigations involving gait. In this survey, the literature of gait analysis concerning criminal investigation is discussed with a comprehensive overview of developments in gait analysis with deep neural networks. Firstly, terminologies and factors regarding human gait with scenarios related to crime are discussed. Subsequently, the areas and domains corresponding to criminal investigation that can be tackled by gait analysis are discussed. Also, deep learning methods for gait analysis and how they can be applied in criminal investigations are presented. Then, gait analysis techniques and approaches using deep learning methods including currently available datasets are mentioned. Moreover, crime-related video datasets are presented with literature on deep learning-based anomaly detection with gait human poses. Finally, challenges regarding gait analysis in criminal investigations are presented with open research issues.

Indexed as

Criminal investigationDeep learningDeep neural networksGait analysisGait biometric

Identifiers

PMID39650492
PMCPMC11622936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.