Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650488›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

A simplified approach for efficiency analysis of machine learning algorithms.

Muthuramalingam Sivakumar, Sudhaman Parthasarathy, Thiyagarajan Padmapriya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muthuramalingam SivakumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sudhaman ParthasarathyDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Thiyagarajan PadmapriyaDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficiency of machine learning (ML) algorithms plays a critical role in their deployment across various applications, particularly those with resource constraints or real-time requirements. This article presents a comprehensive framework for evaluating ML algorithm efficiency by incorporating metrics, such as training time, prediction time, memory usage, and computational resource utilization. The proposed methodology involves a multistep process: collecting raw metrics, normalizing them, applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine weights, and computing a composite efficiency score. We applied this framework to two distinct datasets: medical image data and agricultural crop prediction data. The results demonstrate that our approach effectively differentiates algorithm performance based on the specific demands of each application. For medical image analysis, the framework highlights strengths in robustness and adaptability, whereas for agricultural crop prediction, it emphasizes scalability and resource management. This study provides valuable insights into optimizing ML algorithms, and offers a versatile tool for practitioners to assess and enhance algorithmic efficiency across diverse domains.

Indexed as

Agricultural data predictionAlgorithm performance evaluationAnalytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)Composite efficiency scoreMachine learning efficiencyMedical image analysisMetric normalization

Identifiers

PMID39650488
PMCPMC11623197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.