Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650484›Full record

ReviewPeerJ. Computer science2024

A comprehensive review of sensor node deployment strategies for maximized coverage and energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks.

Anusuya P, Vanitha C N, Jaehyuk Cho, Sathishkumar Veerappampalayam Easwaramoorthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anusuya PDepartment of Computer Science and Design, Kongu Engineering College, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0009-0003-1071-236X
Vanitha C NDepartment of Computer Science and Design, Kongu Engineering College, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jaehyuk ChoDepartment of Software Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9113-6805
Sathishkumar Veerappampalayam EaswaramoorthyDepartment of Computing and Information Systems, Sunway University, Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8271-2022

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have paved the way for a wide array of applications, forming the backbone of systems like smart cities. These systems support various functions, including healthcare, environmental monitoring, traffic management, and infrastructure monitoring. WSNs consist of multiple interconnected sensor nodes and a base station, creating a network whose performance is heavily influenced by the placement of sensor nodes. Proper deployment is crucial as it maximizes coverage and minimizes unnecessary energy consumption. Ensuring effective sensor node deployment for optimal coverage and energy efficiency remains a significant research gap in WSNs. This review article focuses on optimization strategies for WSN deployment, addressing key research questions related to coverage maximization and energy-efficient algorithms. A common limitation of existing single-objective algorithms is their focus on optimizing either coverage or energy efficiency, but not both. To address this, the article explores a dual-objective optimization approach, formulated as maximizing coverage Max ∑(i = 1) ^ N C

Indexed as

CoverageDeploymentEnergy efficiencyNetwork lifetimeOptimizationWireless sensor networks

Identifiers

PMID39650484
PMCPMC11623136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.