ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
DistilRoBiLSTMFuse: an efficient hybrid deep learning approach for sentiment analysis.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Societal crises disrupt long-term increases in stress, negativity, and simplicity in US Billboard song lyrics from 1973 to 2023.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In today's modern society, social media has seamlessly integrated into our daily routines, providing a platform for individuals to express their opinions and emotions openly on the internet. Within this digital domain, sentiment analysis (SA) is a vital tool to understand the emotions conveyed in written text, whether positive, negative, or neutral. However, SA faces challenges such as dealing with diverse language, uneven data, and understanding complex sentences. This study proposes an effective approach for SA. For this, we introduce a hybrid architecture named DistilRoBiLSTMFuse, designed to extract deep contextual information from complex sentences and accurately identify sentiments. In this research, we evaluate our model's performance using two popular benchmark datasets: IMDb and Twitter USAirline sentiment. The raw text data are preprocessed, and this involves several steps, including: (1) implementing a comprehensive data cleaning protocol to remove noise and unnecessary information from the raw text, (2) preparing a custom list of stopwords to retain essential words while omitting common, non-informative words, and (3) applying Lemmatization to achieve consistency in text by reducing words to their base forms, enhancing the accuracy of text analysis. To address class imbalance, this study utilized oversampling, augmenting minority class samples to match the majority, thereby ensuring uniform representation across all categories. Considering the variability in preprocessing techniques across previous studies, our research initially explores the efficacy of seven distinct machine learning (ML) models paired with two commonly employed feature transformation methods: term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) and bag of words (BoW). This approach allows for determining which combination yields optimal performance within these ML frameworks. In our study, the DistilRoBiLSTMFuse model is evaluated on two distinct datasets and consistently delivers outstanding performance, surpassing existing state-of-the-art approaches in each case. On the IMDb dataset, our model achieves 98.91% accuracy in training, 94.16% in validation, and 93.97% in testing. The Twitter USAirline Sentiment dataset reaches 99.42% accuracy in training, 98.52% in validation, and 98.33% in testing. The experimental results clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of our hybrid DistilRoBiLSTMFuse model in SA tasks. The code for this experimental analysis is publicly available and can be accessed
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.