ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Classifying software security requirements into confidentiality, integrity, and availability using machine learning approaches.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Security requirements are considered one of the most important non-functional requirements of software. The CIA (confidentiality, integrity, and availability) triad forms the basis for the development of security systems. Each dimension is expressed as having many security requirements that should be designed, implemented, and tested. However, requirements are written in a natural language and may suffer from ambiguity and inconsistency, which makes it harder to distinguish between different security dimensions. Recognizing the security dimensions in a requirements document should facilitate tracing the requirements and ensuring that a dimension has been implemented in a software system. This process should be automated to reduce time and effort for software engineers. In this paper, we propose to classify the security requirements into CIA triads using Term frequency-inverse document frequency and sentence-transformer embedding as two different technologies for feature extraction. For both techniques, we developed five models by using five well-known machine learning algorithms: (1) support vector machine (SVM), (2) K-nearest neighbors (KNN), (3) Random Forest (RF), (4) gradient boosting (GB), and (5) Bernoulli Naive Bayes (BNB). Also, we developed a web interface that facilitates real-time analysis and classifies security requirements into CIA triads. Our results revealed that SVM with the sentence-transformer technique outperformed all classifiers by 87% accuracy in predicting a type of security dimension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.