Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650437›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Analyzing the critical steps in deep learning-based stock forecasting: a literature review.

Zinnet Duygu Akşehir, Erdal Kılıç

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zinnet Duygu AkşehirComputer Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis University Samsun, Samsun, Turkey.
Erdal KılıçComputer Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis University Samsun, Samsun, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stock market or individual stock forecasting poses a significant challenge due to the influence of uncertainty and dynamic conditions in financial markets. Traditional methods, such as fundamental and technical analysis, have been limited in coping with uncertainty. In recent years, this has led to a growing interest in using deep learning-based models for stock prediction. However, the accuracy and reliability of these models depend on correctly implementing a series of critical steps. These steps include data collection and analysis, feature extraction and selection, noise elimination, model selection and architecture determination, choice of training-test approach, and performance evaluation. This study systematically examined deep learning-based stock forecasting models in the literature, investigating the effects of these steps on the model's forecasting performance. This review focused on the studies between 2020-2024, identifying influential studies by conducting a systematic literature search across three different databases. The identified studies regarding seven critical steps essential for creating successful and reliable prediction models were thoroughly examined. The findings from these examinations were summarized in tables, and the gaps in the literature were detailed. This systematic review not only provides a comprehensive understanding of current studies but also serves as a guide for future research.

Indexed as

Deep learningDenoisingFeature extractionFeature selectionSliding windowStock forecastingTrading simulation

Identifiers

PMID39650437
PMCPMC11623133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.