ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Analyzing the critical steps in deep learning-based stock forecasting: a literature review.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 2LE-BO-DeepTrade: an integrated deep learning framework for stock price prediction.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stock market or individual stock forecasting poses a significant challenge due to the influence of uncertainty and dynamic conditions in financial markets. Traditional methods, such as fundamental and technical analysis, have been limited in coping with uncertainty. In recent years, this has led to a growing interest in using deep learning-based models for stock prediction. However, the accuracy and reliability of these models depend on correctly implementing a series of critical steps. These steps include data collection and analysis, feature extraction and selection, noise elimination, model selection and architecture determination, choice of training-test approach, and performance evaluation. This study systematically examined deep learning-based stock forecasting models in the literature, investigating the effects of these steps on the model's forecasting performance. This review focused on the studies between 2020-2024, identifying influential studies by conducting a systematic literature search across three different databases. The identified studies regarding seven critical steps essential for creating successful and reliable prediction models were thoroughly examined. The findings from these examinations were summarized in tables, and the gaps in the literature were detailed. This systematic review not only provides a comprehensive understanding of current studies but also serves as a guide for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.