ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
A big data analysis algorithm for massive sensor medical images.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MSKT: multimodal data fusion for improved nursing management in hemorrhagic stroke.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Big data analytics for clinical decision-making has been proposed for various clinical sectors because clinical decisions are more evidence-based and promising. Healthcare data is so vast and readily available that big data analytics has completely transformed this sector and opened up many new prospects. The smart sensor-based big data analysis recommendation system has significant privacy and security concerns when using sensor medical images for suggestions and monitoring. The danger of security breaches and unauthorized access, which might lead to identity theft and privacy violations, increases when sending and storing sensitive medical data on the cloud. Our effort will improve patient care and well-being by creating an anomaly detection system based on machine learning specifically for medical images and providing timely treatments and notifications. Current anomaly detection methods in healthcare systems, such as artificial intelligence and big data analytics-intracerebral hemorrhage (AIBDA-ICH) and parallel conformer neural network (PCNN), face several challenges, including high resource consumption, inefficient feature selection, and an inability to handle temporal data effectively for real-time monitoring. Techniques like support vector machines (SVM) and the hidden Markov model (HMM) struggle with computational overhead and scalability in large datasets, limiting their performance in critical healthcare applications. Additionally, existing methods often fail to provide accurate anomaly detection with low latency, making them unsuitable for time-sensitive environments. We infer the extraction, feature selection, attack detection, and data collection and processing procedures to anticipate anomaly inpatient data. We transfer the data, take care of missing values, and sanitize it using the pre-processing mechanism. We employed the recursive feature elimination (RFE) and dynamic principal component analysis (DPCA) algorithms for feature selection and extraction. In addition, we applied the Auto-encoded genetic recurrent neural network (AGRNN) approach to identify abnormalities. Data arrival rate, resource consumption, propagation delay, transaction epoch, true positive rate, false alarm rate, and root mean square error (RMSE) are some metrics used to evaluate the proposed task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.