ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Ability of clinical data to predict readmission in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the challenge of predicting readmissions in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) by analyzing the predictability of readmissions over short, medium, and long term periods. Using health records spanning 35 years, which included 22,643 patients and 30,938 episodes of care, we focused on the episode of care as a central unit, defined as a referral-discharge cycle that incorporates assessments and interventions. Data pre-processing involved handling missing values, normalizing, and transforming data, while resolving issues related to overlapping episodes and correcting registration errors where possible. Readmission prediction was inferred from electronic health records (EHR), as this variable was not directly recorded. A binary classifier distinguished between readmitted and non-readmitted patients, followed by a multi-class classifier to categorize readmissions based on timeframes: short (within 6 months), medium (6 months - 2 years), and long (more than 2 years). Several predictive models were evaluated based on metrics like AUC, F1-score, precision, and recall, and the K-prototype algorithm was employed to explore similarities between episodes through clustering. The optimal binary classifier (Oversampled Gradient Boosting) achieved an AUC of 0.7005, while the multi-class classifier (Oversampled Random Forest) reached an AUC of 0.6368. The K-prototype resulted in three clusters as optimal (SI: 0.256, CI: 4473.64). Despite identifying relationships between care intensity, case complexity, and readmission risk, generalizing these findings proved difficult, partly because clinicians often avoid discharging patients likely to be readmitted. Overall, while this dataset offers insights into patient care and service patterns, predicting readmissions remains challenging, suggesting a need for improved analytical models that consider patient development, disease progression, and intervention effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.