Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650387›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Enhanced detection of accounting fraud using a CNN-LSTM-Attention model optimized by Sparrow search.

Peifeng Wu, Yaqiang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peifeng WuSchool of Statistics, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Yaqiang ChenSchool of Statistics, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, Jilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of corporate accounting fraud is a critical challenge in the financial industry, where traditional models such as neural networks, logistic regression, and support vector machines often fall short in achieving high accuracy due to the complex and evolving nature of fraudulent activities. This paper proposes an enhanced approach to fraud detection by integrating convolutional neural networks (CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, complemented by an attention mechanism to prioritize relevant features. To further improve the model's performance, the sparrow search algorithm (SSA) is employed for parameter optimization, ensuring the best configuration of the CNN-LSTM-Attention framework. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms conventional methods across various evaluation metrics, offering superior accuracy and robustness in recognizing fraudulent patterns in corporate accounting data.

Indexed as

Accounting fraudAttentionNeural networksPredictionSparrow search

Identifiers

PMID39650387
PMCPMC11623018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.