Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650382›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Prediction of antigenic peptides of SARS- CoV-2 pathogen using machine learning.

Syed Nisar Hussain Bukhari, Kingsley A Ogudo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Syed Nisar Hussain BukhariNational Institute of Electronics and Information Technology (NIELIT), Srinagar, J&K, India.
Kingsley A OgudoDepartment of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6589-4904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antigenic peptides (APs), also known as T-cell epitopes (TCEs), represent the immunogenic segment of pathogens capable of inducing an immune response, making them potential candidates for epitope-based vaccine (EBV) design. Traditional wet lab methods for identifying TCEs are expensive, challenging, and time-consuming. Alternatively, computational approaches employing machine learning (ML) techniques offer a faster and more cost-effective solution. In this study, we present a robust XGBoost ML model for predicting TCEs of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus as potential vaccine candidates. The peptide sequences comprising TCEs and non-TCEs retrieved from Immune Epitope Database Repository (IEDB) were subjected to feature extraction process to extract their physicochemical properties for model training. Upon evaluation using a test dataset, the model achieved an impressive accuracy of 97.6%, outperforming other ML classifiers. Employing a five-fold cross-validation a mean accuracy of 97.58% was recorded, indicating consistent and linear performance across all iterations. While the predicted epitopes show promise as vaccine candidates for SARS-CoV-2, further scientific examination through

Indexed as

Antigenic peptideCOVID-19Epitope-based vaccineMachine learningSARS-CoV-2T-cell epitopeXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID39650382
PMCPMC11623221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.