ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
General retrieval network model for multi-class plant leaf diseases based on hashing.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid CNN model for multi-class freshness and disease detection in local spinach varieties.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- A compact deep learning approach integrating depthwise convolutions and spatial attention for plant disease classification.Plant methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional disease retrieval and localization for plant leaves typically demand substantial human resources and time. In this study, an intelligent approach utilizing deep hash convolutional neural networks (DHCNN) is presented to address these challenges and enhance retrieval performance. By integrating a collision-resistant hashing technique, this method demonstrates an improved ability to distinguish highly similar disease features, achieving over 98.4% in both precision and true positive rate (TPR) for single-plant disease retrieval on crops like apple, corn and tomato. For multi-plant disease retrieval, the approach further achieves impressive Precision of 99.5%, TPR of 99.6% and F-score of 99.58% on the augmented PlantVillage dataset, confirming its robustness in handling diverse plant diseases. This method ensures precise disease retrieval in demanding conditions, whether for single or multiple plant scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.