ReviewPeerJ. Computer science2024
Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches in cerebral palsy diagnosis, prognosis, and management: a comprehensive review.
Review in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring Assistive Technology Outcomes via AI-Based Kinematic Modeling of Individualized Routine Learning in Elite Boccia Athletes with Severe Cerebral Palsy: A Longitudinal Case Series.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in rehabilitation: a review of clinical effectiveness, real-world performance, safety, and equity across modalities and settings.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- MSKT: multimodal data fusion for improved nursing management in hemorrhagic stroke.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Clinical and instrument-based assessment of balance, gait, and motor functions in pediatric cerebral palsy: A systematic review.Wearable technologies · 2025Review
- Advancing Gait Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Robotic Exoskeletons for Cerebral Palsy.Wearable technologies · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a group of disorders that alters patients' muscle coordination, posture, and movement, resulting in a wide range of deformities. Cerebral palsy can be caused by various factors, both prenatal and postnatal, such as infections or injuries that damage different parts of the brain. As brain plasticity is more prevalent during childhood, early detection can help take the necessary course of management and treatments that would significantly benefit patients by improving their quality of life. Currently, cerebral palsy patients receive regular physiotherapies, occupational therapies, speech therapies, and medications to deal with secondary abnormalities arising due to CP. Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) over the years have demonstrated the potential to improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of CP. This review article synthesizes existing research on AI and ML techniques applied to CP. It provides a comprehensive overview of the role of AI-ML in cerebral palsy, focusing on its applications, benefits, challenges, and future prospects. Through an extensive examination of existing literature, we explore various AI-ML approaches, including but not limited to assessment, diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcome prediction for cerebral palsy. Additionally, we address the ethical considerations, technical limitations, and barriers to the widespread adoption of AI-ML for CP patient care. By synthesizing current knowledge and identifying gaps in research, this review aims to guide future endeavors in harnessing AI-ML for optimizing outcomes and transforming care delivery in cerebral palsy rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.