ReviewPeerJ. Computer science2024
Comparative analysis of deep learning algorithms for dental caries detection and prediction from radiographic images: a comprehensive umbrella review.
Review in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Calcifications on Panoramic Radiographs: A Meta-analysis.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Use of artificial intelligence for detection of MB2 canals in maxillary first molars on CBCT: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Accuracy of artificial intelligence in caries detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Head & face medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Charting New Territory: AI Applications in Dental Caries Detection from Panoramic Imaging.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Automated Caries Detection Under Dental Restorations and Braces Using Deep Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Responsible Innovation in AI-Driven Teledentistry: Ethical, Legal, and Economic Considerations for the Globalization Era.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) have made a considerable impact in dentistry, specifically in advancing image processing algorithms for detecting caries from radiographical images. Despite this progress, there is still a lack of data on the effectiveness of these algorithms in accurately identifying caries. This study provides an overview aimed at evaluating and comparing reviews that focus on the detection of Materials and Methods: This comprehensive umbrella review adhered to the "Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions" (PRIOR). Specific keywords were generated to assess the accuracy of AI and DL algorithms in detecting DC from radiographical images. To ensure the highest quality of research, thorough searches were performed on PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. Additionally, bias in the selected articles was rigorously assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool. Results: In this umbrella review, seven systematic reviews (SRs) were assessed from a total of 77 studies included. Various DL algorithms were used across these studies, with conventional neural networks and other techniques being the predominant methods for detecting DC. The SRs included in the study examined 24 original articles that used 2D radiographical images for caries detection. Accuracy rates varied between 0.733 and 0.986 across datasets ranging in size from 15 to 2,500 images. Conclusion: The advancement of DL algorithms in detecting and predicting DC through radiographic imaging is a significant breakthrough. These algorithms excel in extracting subtle features from radiographic images and applying machine learning techniques to achieve highly accurate predictions, often outperforming human experts. This advancement holds immense potential to transform diagnostic processes in dentistry, promising to considerably improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.