ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Leveraging machine learning for the detection of structured interference in Global Navigation Satellite Systems.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radio frequency interference disrupts services offered by Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). Spoofing is the transmission of structured interference signals intended to deceive GNSS location and timing services. The identification of spoofing is vital, especially for safety-of-life aviation services, since the receiver is unaware of counterfeit signals. Although numerous spoofing detection and mitigation techniques have been developed, spoofing attacks are becoming more sophisticated, limiting most of these methods. This study explores the application of machine learning techniques for discerning authentic signals from counterfeit ones. The investigation particularly focuses on the secure code estimation and replay (SCER) spoofing attack, one of the most challenging type of spoofing attacks, ds8 scenario of the Texas Spoofing Test Battery (TEXBAT) dataset. The proposed framework uses tracking data from delay lock loop correlators as intrinsic features to train four distinct machine learning (ML) models: logistic regression, support vector machines (SVM) classifier, K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and decision tree. The models are trained employing a random six-fold cross-validation methodology. It can be observed that both logistic regression and SVM can detect spoofing with a mean F1-score of 94%. However, logistic regression provides 165dB gain in terms of time efficiency as compared to SVM and 3 better than decision tree-based classifier. These performance metrics as well as receiver operating characteristic curve analysis make logistic regression the desirable approach for identifying SCER structured interference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.