Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650340›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Leveraging machine learning for the detection of structured interference in Global Navigation Satellite Systems.

Imtiaz Nabi, Salma Zainab Farooq, Sunnyaha Saeed, Syed Ali Irtaza, Khurram Shehzad, Mohammad Arif, Inayat Khan, Shafiq Ahmad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Imtiaz NabiNational Center of GIS and Space Applications (NCGSA), Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Salma Zainab FarooqNational Center of GIS and Space Applications (NCGSA), Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Sunnyaha SaeedNational Center of GIS and Space Applications (NCGSA), Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Syed Ali IrtazaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Khurram ShehzadDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Mohammad ArifDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Republic of South Korea.
Inayat KhanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Engineering and Technology, Mardan, Pakistan.
Shafiq AhmadIndustrial Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radio frequency interference disrupts services offered by Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). Spoofing is the transmission of structured interference signals intended to deceive GNSS location and timing services. The identification of spoofing is vital, especially for safety-of-life aviation services, since the receiver is unaware of counterfeit signals. Although numerous spoofing detection and mitigation techniques have been developed, spoofing attacks are becoming more sophisticated, limiting most of these methods. This study explores the application of machine learning techniques for discerning authentic signals from counterfeit ones. The investigation particularly focuses on the secure code estimation and replay (SCER) spoofing attack, one of the most challenging type of spoofing attacks, ds8 scenario of the Texas Spoofing Test Battery (TEXBAT) dataset. The proposed framework uses tracking data from delay lock loop correlators as intrinsic features to train four distinct machine learning (ML) models: logistic regression, support vector machines (SVM) classifier, K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and decision tree. The models are trained employing a random six-fold cross-validation methodology. It can be observed that both logistic regression and SVM can detect spoofing with a mean F1-score of 94%. However, logistic regression provides 165dB gain in terms of time efficiency as compared to SVM and 3 better than decision tree-based classifier. These performance metrics as well as receiver operating characteristic curve analysis make logistic regression the desirable approach for identifying SCER structured interference.

Indexed as

Global positioning systemGNSS securityGNSS spoofingSignal quality monitoringSpoofing detection

Identifiers

PMID39650340
PMCPMC11623110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.