Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650267›Full record

ArticleShoulder & elbow2024

Isometric shoulder strength: Normative Australian population data and associated factors.

Phillip Fr Duke, Darcy Bennett, Ruby Strauss, Susan E Peters, Mark Ross

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Shoulder & elbow, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Phillip Fr DukeBrisbane Hand and Upper Limb Research Institute, Brisbane Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Darcy BennettBrisbane Hand and Upper Limb Research Institute, Brisbane Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Ruby StraussBrisbane Hand and Upper Limb Research Institute, Brisbane Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Susan E PetersBrisbane Hand and Upper Limb Research Institute, Brisbane Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Mark RossBrisbane Hand and Upper Limb Research Institute, Brisbane Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4624-787X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Age and sex are known predictors of isometric shoulder strength and therefore must be accounted for when noting strength values or administering assessments such as the Constant Score. Given the popularity of the Constant Score, it is important to ensure protocols and values remain clinically relevant and are representative of the intended population. Method: Isometric shoulder strength was recorded for 511 participants without shoulder pathology using the Chatillon Results: Normative values for shoulder strength were generated. Age ( Conclusion: This study generated normative shoulder strength values for a sample of the Australian population and provided a comparison between other normative scores. Significant demographic predictors in addition to age and sex were identified. Level of Evidence: III.

Indexed as

constant scoreisometric strengthoutcome measureshoulder function

Identifiers

PMID39650267
PMCPMC11622340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.