Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650259›Full record

ArticleSouthern African journal of infectious diseases2024

Improving peritoneal dialysis fluid culture-positivity yield from 2022 to 2023.

Jenna A van der Vyver, Teena Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Southern African journal of infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jenna A van der VyverDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Science, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4764-0051
Teena ThomasDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Science, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2720-1123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Microbiological testing of peritoneal dialysis bags for peritonitis often yields culture-negative results. Culture-negative samples should not exceed > 15% according to the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. To reduce this issue, the addition of a blood culture bottle incubation step to the culture process was introduced at the Infection Control Services Laboratory (ICSL) of the National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS). Objectives: The aim of the study was to ascertain if the change in methodology increased the culture-positivity yield and reduced the culture-negative percentage. Method: Data from the NHLS Central Data Warehouse (CDW) were analysed to compare the culture-positive results over two periods: June-December 2022 when the non-blood culture (B/C) bottle method was used and January-July 2023 when the B/C bottle method was implemented. Results: The non-B/C culture method yielded a 23% culture-positivity yield, whereas the B/C bottle-based method yielded a 51% culture-positivity yield. However, the culture-negative yield for the B/C bottle-based method was high at 49%. Conclusion: The change in dialysis bag processing in 2023 led to a more than doubling in culture-positivity yield. However, the culture-negative percentage remained high. As a result, further modifications to the methodology are needed. Contribution: The study findings illustrate that the addition of the B/C bottle incubation step significantly improved peritoneal dialysis bag culture yields which directly impacts patient management.

Indexed as

culture-positivityculture yielddialysis bagdialysis fluidperitoneal fluidsperitonitis

Identifiers

PMID39650259
PMCPMC11622140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.