SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2024
Effectiveness of abdominal electroacupuncture therapy for poststroke constipation: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07496697 (Investigation of Bowel Motility Changes Following Electroacupuncture at NP82), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Investigation of Bowel Motility Changes Following Electroacupuncture at NP82 (Tongbian) and SP15 (Daheng) Acupoint Pair in Healthy Volunteers
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Electroacupuncture (EA) has been employed to address the symptoms of constipation in individuals who have experienced a stroke. However, supporting evidence for its efficacy is lacking. This meta-analysis aims to investigate whether EA was effective in treating poststroke constipation. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of eight databases, including four English-language databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) and four Chinese-language databases (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, and Wanfang), for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from inception through January 31, 2023. To assess treatment effectiveness, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of 9 RCTs involving 601 participants were included. No heterogeneity was found across the included RCTs. The results of this meta-analysis indicated significant improvements in the total effective rate (RR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.27, 1.52), cure rates (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.38, 2.54), constipation scoring system (MD = -2.51, 95% CI -3.05, -1.97), and quality of life (MD = -10.69, 95% CI -14.2, -7.17) in the EA group compared with the control group. Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that EA may be recommended for patients experiencing poststroke constipation. The lack of thorough investigations has undermined the quality of the major findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.