Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650236›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

Integrating radiomics with clinical data for enhanced prediction of vertebral fracture risk.

Babak Saravi, Alisia Zink, Elene Tabukashvili, Hamza Eren Güzel, Sara Ülkümen, Sebastien Couillard-Despres, Gernot Michael Lang, Frank Hassel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Emerging applications of feature selection in osteoporosis research: from biomarker discovery to clinical decision support.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Babak SaraviDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Alisia ZinkDepartment of Spine Surgery, Loretto Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
Elene TabukashviliDepartment of Spine Surgery, Loretto Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
Hamza Eren GüzelDepartment of Radiology, Ministry of Health Izmir City Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye.
Sara ÜlkümenDepartment of Spine Surgery, Loretto Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
Sebastien Couillard-DespresInstitute of Experimental Neuroregeneration, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Gernot Michael LangDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Frank HasselDepartment of Spine Surgery, Loretto Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are a major cause of morbidity, disability, and mortality among the elderly. Traditional methods for fracture risk assessment, such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), may not fully capture the complex factors contributing to fracture risk. This study aims to enhance vertebral fracture risk prediction by integrating radiomics features extracted from computed tomography (CT) scans with clinical data, utilizing advanced machine learning techniques. Methods: We analyzed CT imaging data and clinical records from 124 patients, extracting a comprehensive set of radiomics features. The dataset included shape, texture, and intensity metrics from segmented vertebrae, alongside clinical variables such as age and DXA T-values. Feature selection was conducted using a Random Forest model, and the predictive performance of multiple machine learning models-Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machines, and XGBoost-was evaluated. Outcomes included the number of fractures (N_Fx), mean fracture grade, and mean fracture shape. Incorporating radiomics features with clinical data significantly improved predictive accuracy across all outcomes. The XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an R Discussion: This study underscores the potential of radiomics as a valuable tool for enhancing fracture risk assessment beyond traditional clinical methods. The integration of radiomics features with clinical data provides a more nuanced understanding of vertebral bone health, facilitating more accurate risk stratification and personalized management in osteoporosis care. Future research should focus on standardizing radiomics methodologies and validating these findings across diverse populations.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceCT imagingfeature extractionmachine learningosteoporosispredictive modelingradiomicsvertebral fractures

Identifiers

PMID39650236
PMCPMC11620855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.