Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650187›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Efficacy and safety of eravacycline versus tigecycline for complicated intra-abdominal infections in the ICU: a multicenter, single-blind, parallel randomized controlled trial study protocol.

Jin Jie Liu, Dong Dong Guo, Meng Xing Wang, Yan Zhao Li, Hang Li, Si Bo Liu, Rong Li Yang, Dian Hong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Evolution, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Implications of Mobile Tetracycline Destructases.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Managing skin infections in burn patients: principles and pitfalls.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jin Jie LiuDepartment of General Medicine, Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology (Dalian Municipal Central Hospital), Dalian, China.
Dong Dong GuoIntensive Care Unit, Ansteel Group General Hospital, Anshan, China.
Meng Xing WangChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Yan Zhao LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Hang LiDepartment of Geriatrics, Affiliated Dalian Friendship Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Si Bo LiuIntensive Care Unit, Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology (Dalian Municipal Central Hospital), Dalian, China.
Rong Li YangIntensive Care Unit, Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology (Dalian Municipal Central Hospital), Dalian, China.
Dian Hong ZhangIntensive Care Unit, Ansteel Group General Hospital, Anshan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), often caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria such as carbapenem-resistant Methods: This is a multicenter, single-blind, parallel randomized controlled trial. Adult patients in the ICU with complex abdominal infections who meet the eligibility criteria will be included. The main outcome is the all-cause 30-day mortality of patients in clinically evaluable and microbiologically evaluable populations. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of total responsive patients in the clinically evaluable population at the end of treatment and test of cure visits; the proportion of total responsive patients in the microbiologically evaluable population at the end of treatment and test of cure visits; and ICU hospitalization time and costs. Safety assessments include the incidence of various adverse events and changes in clinical laboratory test results. The subjects will be randomly assigned to receive treatment with either eravacycline or tigecycline at a 1:1 ratio. The all-cause mortality rates of patients treated with eravacycline and TGC were 17.7 and 18.7%, respectively, with an estimated actual mortality rate of 0.95. A total sample size of 262 subjects is required to reach 80% power with an Ethics and communication: This trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ansteel Group General Hospital. The communication plan includes presentations at scientific conferences, scientific publications, and presentations to the public through nonprofessional media. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, ChiCTR2300078646.

Indexed as

clinical trial protocoleravacyclineintensive care unitintraabdominal infectionstigecycline

Identifiers

PMID39650187
PMCPMC11620859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.