Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650117›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Deep learning-based classification of alfalfa varieties: A comparative study using a custom leaf image dataset.

Yonis Gulzar, Zeynep Ünal, Tefide Kızıldeniz, Usman Muhammad Umar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yonis GulzarDepartment of Management Information Systems, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Zeynep ÜnalDepartment of Biosystem Engineering, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Central Campus, 51240, Niğde, Türkiye.
Tefide KızıldenizDepartment of Biosystem Engineering, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Central Campus, 51240, Niğde, Türkiye.
Usman Muhammad UmarDepartment of Plant Production and Technology, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Central Campus, 51240, Niğde, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has profoundly impacted agriculture by enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of plant classification tasks. In particular, advanced models have significantly improved the ability to classify various plant species based on their visual features. This study focuses on classifying alfalfa plant varieties using deep learning techniques. We created a custom dataset comprising 1,214 images of three alfalfa varieties (Bilensoy-80, Diana and Nimet) cultivated under controlled conditions. Our comparative study involved several state-of-the-art models, including MobileNetV3, InceptionV3, Xception, VGG19, DenseNet121, ResNet101, and EfficientNetB3, to assess their performance in classifying these alfalfa varieties. We evaluated these models with various configurations: learning rates ranging from 0.1 to 0.000001, batch sizes of 8, 16, 32, and 64, and using dropout with a decay rate of 0.96 and decay steps of 1000. The results revealed that models trained with transfer learning generally achieved higher test accuracies. For instance, DenseNet121 achieved a test accuracy of 0.9945 when trained from scratch and 1.0000 with transfer learning, while EfficientNetB3 achieved a test accuracy of 0.9945 with both methods. The findings underscore the effectiveness of transfer learning in enhancing model performance for plant classification tasks.•The study introduced a unique dataset consisting of 1214 images of three alfalfa varieties (Bilensoy-80, Diana, and Nimet) cultivated under controlled conditions, providing a valuable resource for advancing plant classification research.•The research compared the performance of several state-of-the-art deep learning models (MobileNetV3, InceptionV3, Xception, VGG19, DenseNet121, ResNet101, and EfficientNetB3) with various hyperparameter configurations, demonstrating the effectiveness of different architectures for classifying alfalfa plant varieties.•The study highlighted the superior performance of transfer learning in plant classification tasks, with models like DenseNet121 and EfficientNetB3 achieving near-perfect accuracy, underscoring its potential to significantly enhance model accuracy and efficiency in agricultural applications.

Indexed as

Alfalfa plantArtificial IntelligenceComparative Deep Learning Model EvaluationImage classificationModel EvaluationPlant ClassificationTransfer Learning

Identifiers

PMID39650117
PMCPMC11625211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.