ArticleMethodsX2024
Deep learning-based classification of alfalfa varieties: A comparative study using a custom leaf image dataset.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Network-Based Study for Rice Leaf Disease Recognition and Classification: A Comparative Analysis Between Feature-Based Model and Direct Imaging Model.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Harnessing deep learning for wheat variety classification: a convolutional neural network and transfer learning approach.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2025Article
- VGG-EffAttnNet: Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Automated Chili Plant Disease Classification Using VGG16 and EfficientNetB0 With Attention Mechanism.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- A large language model for multimodal identification of crop diseases and pests.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Research on agricultural disease recognition methods based on very large Kernel convolutional network-RepLKNet.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MoSViT: a lightweight vision transformer framework for efficient disease detection via precision attention mechanism.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Comparison of deep learning models in automatic classification of coffee bean species.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based phenotyping of lettuce diseases using Efficient-FBM-FRMNet for precision agriculture.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- DSA-net: a lightweight and efficient deep learning-based model for pea leaf disease identification.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning has profoundly impacted agriculture by enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of plant classification tasks. In particular, advanced models have significantly improved the ability to classify various plant species based on their visual features. This study focuses on classifying alfalfa plant varieties using deep learning techniques. We created a custom dataset comprising 1,214 images of three alfalfa varieties (Bilensoy-80, Diana and Nimet) cultivated under controlled conditions. Our comparative study involved several state-of-the-art models, including MobileNetV3, InceptionV3, Xception, VGG19, DenseNet121, ResNet101, and EfficientNetB3, to assess their performance in classifying these alfalfa varieties. We evaluated these models with various configurations: learning rates ranging from 0.1 to 0.000001, batch sizes of 8, 16, 32, and 64, and using dropout with a decay rate of 0.96 and decay steps of 1000. The results revealed that models trained with transfer learning generally achieved higher test accuracies. For instance, DenseNet121 achieved a test accuracy of 0.9945 when trained from scratch and 1.0000 with transfer learning, while EfficientNetB3 achieved a test accuracy of 0.9945 with both methods. The findings underscore the effectiveness of transfer learning in enhancing model performance for plant classification tasks.•The study introduced a unique dataset consisting of 1214 images of three alfalfa varieties (Bilensoy-80, Diana, and Nimet) cultivated under controlled conditions, providing a valuable resource for advancing plant classification research.•The research compared the performance of several state-of-the-art deep learning models (MobileNetV3, InceptionV3, Xception, VGG19, DenseNet121, ResNet101, and EfficientNetB3) with various hyperparameter configurations, demonstrating the effectiveness of different architectures for classifying alfalfa plant varieties.•The study highlighted the superior performance of transfer learning in plant classification tasks, with models like DenseNet121 and EfficientNetB3 achieving near-perfect accuracy, underscoring its potential to significantly enhance model accuracy and efficiency in agricultural applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.