ArticleMethodsX2024
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of a portuguese version of the eating disorder assessment for DSM-5 (EDA-5) for Brazil and Portugal.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The EDA-5 was translated from English to Portuguese, followed by a cross-cultural adaptation for use in Brazil and Portugal. Two independent translators worked on the Brazilian and European Portuguese versions, which were then reviewed to create a harmonized version. This version was back-translated into English and approved by the original author. Twenty specialists (ten from each country) evaluated the interview's comprehensibility, and items that more than 20% of experts found unclear were revised. Despite sharing a common language, cultural and linguistic differences between the two Portuguese variants were observed. Discrepancies were addressed in the final version, and only 5.8% of the items in Brazil and 11.6% in Portugal were deemed unclear. The harmonized Portuguese version of the EDA-5 was well-received and is now available for healthcare professionals in both countries.•The final harmonized Portuguese version of the EDA-5 is available online and was well-understood by eating disorder specialists in both Brazil and Portugal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.