ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
One-piece resection for the treatment of ventral intradural extramedullary spinal meningioma: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic Review Comparing Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of Intradural Extramedullary Tumours (IDEM).Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of one-piece resection for the treatment of ventral intradural extramedullary spinal meningiomas (VIESMs). Methods: Between January 2017 and December 2023, all patients who underwent one-piece resection for VIESMs were retrospectively reviewed with their demographic, intraoperative and postoperative data being recorded. In addition, postoperative neurological status based on the modified McCormick functional schema (mMFS), along with radiological manifestations on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were assessed and compared with that before the operation. Results: A total of 27 cases (7 men and 20 women) with an average age of 63.37 ± 10.48 years old were included in the present study with the operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and follow-up periods being 292.41 ± 42.64 min, 286.85 ± 47.03 ml, 10.37 ± 1.69 days, and 16.81 ± 10.79 months, respectively. Postoperatively, one case experienced cerebrospinal fluid leakage without neurological deterioration. At the final follow-up, the mMFS scores were unchanged in seven (25.93%) cases while they improved in the remaining 20 (74.07%) cases. Finally, the MRI examinations showed that one-piece resection was successfully performed for each VIESM without a recurrence. Conclusion: One-piece resection was a feasible, safe and effective procedure for treating VIESMs. Partial removal of the ipsilateral pedicle, facet joint, and even posterior vertebral wall to establish a wide surgical corridor and vision, resection of the dentate ligaments to minimize spinal cord traction, and meticulous coagulation of the dural attachment to reduce recurrence were the key technical points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.