Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650030›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2024

Approximation of reliabilities for random-regression single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models.

M Bermann, I Aguilar, A Alvarez Munera, J Bauer, J Šplíchal, D Lourenco, I Misztal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M BermannDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
I AguilarInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), 11500 Montevideo, Uruguay.
A Alvarez MuneraDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
J BauerCzech Moravian Breeders' Corporation, Benešovská 123, 252 09 Hradištko, Czech Republic.
J ŠplíchalCzech Moravian Breeders' Corporation, Benešovská 123, 252 09 Hradištko, Czech Republic.
D LourencoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
I MisztalDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Random-regression models (RRM) are used in national genetic evaluations for longitudinal traits. The outputs of RRM are an index based on random-regression coefficients and its reliability. The reliabilities are obtained from the inverse of the coefficient matrix of mixed model equations (MME). The reliabilities must be approximated for large datasets because it is impossible to invert the MME. There is no extensive literature on methods to approximate the reliabilities of RRM when genomic information is included by single-step GBLUP. We developed an algorithm to approximate such reliabilities. Our method combines the reliability of the index without genomic information with the reliability of a GBLUP model in terms of effective record contributions. We tested our algorithm in the 3-lactation model for milk yield from the Czech Republic. The data had 30 million test-day records, 2.5 million animals in the pedigree, and 54,000 genotyped animals. The correlation between our approximation and the reliabilities obtained from the inversion of the MME was 0.98, and the slope and intercept of the regression were 0.91 and 0.02, respectively. The elapsed time to approximate the reliabilities for the Czech data was 21 min.

Identifiers

PMID39650030
PMCPMC11624375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.