Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650006›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2024

Understanding the dynamics of mastitis in milk yield: Decoding onset and recovery patterns in response to mastitis occurrence.

A L L Sguizzato, T E da Silva, J C C Chagas, A M Argüelo, N M Gonçalves, M I Marcondes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A L L SguizzatoDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil.
T E da SilvaDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405.
J C C ChagasDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 90183, Sweden.
A M ArgüeloUniform-Agri, Assen, Drenthe, 9401LB, the Netherlands.
N M GonçalvesUniform-Agri, Assen, Drenthe, 9401LB, the Netherlands.
M I MarcondesDepartment of Animal Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No recent study has attempted to model daily milk losses before and after mastitis onset and the moment when it begins. Thus, we aimed to describe the impact of mastitis on milk production based on mastitis level and moment of occurrence. We used data from 11 dairy farms, and the dataset consisted of 885,759 daily individual milk test records from 3,508 cows in different lactations, with an average milk yield (MY) from January 2017 to December 2022. We modeled the impact of mastitis severity (i.e., 1 [mild] and 2 [severe]) based on the drop and recovery of MY following 3 steps. First, we removed milk recorded on the day of diagnosis of mastitis from the dataset and fitted a Wood's curve for each cow and parity. Second, we returned the mastitis data to the dataset and estimated the residual milk loss due to mastitis from 15 d before to 30 d after the mastitis event. Third, we used generalized additive mixed effect models to estimate the residual milk loss, including farm as a random effect. In addition to the random effect of the farm, we also included the predicted milk yield (by Wood's curve) over the influence of mastitis, the day effect before and after mastitis incidence, and the interaction between the predicted value of mastitis and days. On average, mastitis level 2 resulted in a more severe MY drop in all represented stages of lactation (80, 170, and 260 DIM), suggesting a higher loss close to the lactation peak, approximately 130 kg more than mastitis level 1. Moreover, the occurrence of mastitis case level 1 during the early phase of lactation (DIM 80) can cause an average milk loss of 158 L and mastitis level 2, an average loss of 288 L. The estimations suggest that milk drop occurs 14 to 4 d before mastitis onset and can last until 15 to 25 d from the diagnosis, which would be the necessary time for a cow to re-establish their predicted MY. Therefore, our study brings new perspectives to investigate MY drop and recovery due to mastitis infections and how much mastitis can deplete and impair milk production.

Identifiers

PMID39650006
PMCPMC11624389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.