ReviewIndian journal of dermatology
Combination Therapy for Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis: A Literature Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Indian journal of dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: insights into underlying pathogenic mechanisms and genetic landscape.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- In Vitro Assessment of the Combined Activity of Amphotericin B and CuTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is a neglected skin disease that has tremendous epidemiological significance as a reservoir of Leishmania parasites. Relapse, drug resistance, non-compliance to prolonged treatment, poor health-seeking behaviour, along with limited therapeutic options pose a significant impact on the management of PKDL. In this study, we aimed to review the efficacy, safety and tolerability data of combination therapies for PKDL in the published literature. We have also described patients' compliance with treatment and associated co-infections in PKDL. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar to identify the relevant articles. A total of nine studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. Drug combinations used in India were miltefosine-liposomal amphotericin-B, miltefosine-paromomycin, miltefosine-amphotericin-B, sodium stibogluconate (SSG)-immunotherapy and SSG-rifampicin. However, in Sudan, except one, all studies have used SSG-based combinations viz. SSG-rifampicin, SSG-paromomycin and SSG-immunotherapy. The efficacy and safety of miltefosine in combination with liposomal amphotericin-B as well as conventional amphotericin-B were found to be excellent in a limited number of patients. These combinations are said to have better patient compliance and shorter treatment duration. Another combination of miltefosine and paromomycin was found to be satisfactory with a final cure rate of 83.3%. SSG in combination with paromomycin had a good clinical outcome among severe PKDL patients in Sudan, though pain at the injection site was experienced by all patients. There is a lack of data on combination therapies for PKDL through large-scale randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Therefore, multicentric randomized controlled trials with a sufficiently large sample size are urgently needed to verify the efficacy, safety, and other advantages of combination therapies for PKDL. With the availability of liposomal amphotericin-B, miltefosine and immunotherapy, clinical management of PKDL appears promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.