ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Spinal hydatid disease: a case report - an uncommon differential diagnosis in LMICs.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erratum: Spinal hydatid disease: a case report - an uncommon differential diagnosis in LMICs: Erratum.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Importance: With a 0.2-1% incidence, spinal hydatid disease is a very uncommon diagnosis. While it is uncommon in affluent nations, it should be taken into account when making a differential diagnosis for spinal cord compression syndrome, particularly in regions where it is prevalent. Case Presentation: The authors report a case of hydatid illness of the spine. A 52-year-old man presented with lower extremity discomfort and spastic paraparesis, trouble urinating, and back pain and edema. He had at the level of the 12th thoracic to third lumbar vertebrae (Th12-L3) with paraspinal extension. The patient was treated with 4 months of antiparasitic therapy and two surgical resections performed by general surgeons. Histological analysis showed pieces of fibrous tissue exhibiting granulomatous inflammation; however, no evidence of acid-resistant bacteria or PAS-positive chitin membrane was found. The existence of bacteria following therapy has not been confirmed by the parasitological investigation of the lesions. Clinical Discussion: Primary spinal hydrodatidosis is a rare condition that affects about 0.2-1% of the population. Conclusion: Due to the rarity of this disease, early discovery and timely treatment are critical, and this diagnosis should be considered when generating a differential diagnosis for spinal cord compression syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.