ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Summary of the best evidence for vocal rehabilitation training in adults with unilateral vocal fold paralysis.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To search, evaluate, and summarize the relevant evidence of voice rehabilitation training in adults with unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP). Methods: Using the '6S' model, the database of UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, domestic and foreign guidelines, and voice rehabilitation training for adults with UVFP were systematically searched. The search includes clinical decisions, guidelines, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and expert consensus. Data search since the establishment of the database to 27 November 2023. The quality evaluation of the literature methodology and the extraction and integration of evidence were carried out independently by two researchers. Results: A total of 12 literature were included, including 2 systematic reviews, 2 expert consensus, 4 guidelines, 2 clinical decisions, and 2 randomized controlled trials. Four categories of 16 pieces of evidence were summarized: evaluation of vocal cord paralysis, voice rehabilitation training, health education, joint decision-making, and multidisciplinary cooperation. Conclusion: This study summarized the best evidence of voice rehabilitation training for adults with UVFP and provided evidence-based summary for clinical staff to carry out relevant interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.