ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
An unexpected cause of intractable dysphagia after 20 years following cervical spine instrumentation using bone cement alone: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A New Technique for Placing Pedicle Screws Into Bone Cement-Strengthened Vertebrae Involving Drilling and Melting.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Importance: Postoperative dysphagia following anterior cervical discectomy fusion (ACDF) for cervical disc herniation is still poorly understood. Dysphagia after anterior spinal cervical approach is mild and transient. Here, the authors present a rare case suffering with severe progressive dysphagia for over 1 year after 20 years of ACDF due to expulsed bone cement abutting the esophagus which was successfully removed after reoperation. Case Presentation: A 59-year-old homemaker female presented to us with a foreign body sensation in the throat Clinical Discussion: The exact pathophysiology of dysphagia after ACF surgery remains unknown. In our case, there was an expulsion of the graft. The graft used was polymethyl methacrylate, commonly known as bone cement, which was placed 20 years back. Since polymethyl methacrylate is bioinert material, the graft may have expulsed from its site of placement and thus compressed the esophagus. Taking into consideration of the cost-effectiveness and maintenance of spinal mobility, few neurosurgeons believe that the application of bone cement in ACF surgery as a spacer is a safe and very cost-effective modality compared to modern expensive artificial disc. Conclusion: Dysphagia after ACDF surgery is usually underrecognized. Although the serious complications after ACDF surgery are rare, dysphagia can cause prolonged morbidity to patients. Using bone cement alone for ACDF surgery may carry the risk of its anterior expulsion even after a long period of surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.