ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
An associate of suspicious axillary node and sentinel node in breast cancer to minimizing axillary surgery, prospective cohort study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Arm morbidity and postoperative complications following sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) are common problems in patients with breast cancer. The de-escalating axillary surgery is increasing; however, there is a lack of patients with suspicious nodes. This study aimed to reduce the need for SLNB in suspicious lymph node cases. Methods: A prospective cohort study of women with invasive breast cancer who underwent surgery between January 2021 and December 2022. The study included two cohorts: Cohort A comprised patients with stage cT1-2N0-1M0 cancer who planned upfront surgery, while Cohort B included patients with stages cT1-4N2M0, cT3-4N1M0, or cT1-2N0-1M0 who received neoadjuvant systemic treatment. During the study, a clip was inserted into the suspicious lymph node on imaging to determine whether it could serve as a sentinel node and potentially replace SLNB or reduce the need for axillary surgery. Result: In cohort A, 22 surgeries were performed, while in cohort B, seven surgeries were performed. The median follow-up time was 15 months. In cohort A, 71% of the patients had cN0 disease, while 28% had cN1 disease. A suspicious node correlated to a sentinel node was noted in 66.67% of cohort A. The false-negative rate (FNR) was 14.28%. However, when the clip node removal procedure was performed instead of the sentinel node procedure, the FNR was 10%. Conclusion: In early breast cancer, suspicious nodes in imaging studies could not currently represent sentinel lymph nodes, and the FNR was still high. Nevertheless, more studies with larger populations will provide a better understanding due to the limited number of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.