Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649804›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Assessment of field performance and bruchid resistance during seed storage of a genetically modified cowpea expressing the alpha-amylase inhibitor 1 protein from common bean.

Jerry A Nboyine, Muhammad L Umar, Gloria A Adazebra, Iliyasu M Utono, Philip Agrengsore, Frederick J Awuku, Mohammed F Ishiyaku, Jose M Barrero, Thomas J V Higgins, Donald J MacKenzie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Cowpea (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jerry A NboyineEntomology Section, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.
Muhammad L UmarIntitute for Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Gloria A AdazebraEntomology Section, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.
Iliyasu M UtonoIntitute for Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Philip AgrengsoreEntomology Section, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.
Frederick J AwukuCouncil for Scientific and Industrial Research, Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.
Mohammed F IshiyakuIntitute for Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Jose M BarreroCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Thomas J V HigginsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Donald J MacKenzieInstitute for International Crop Improvement, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The cowpea weevil, Methods: Trials were conducted in Ghana and Nigeria during the 2023 growing season to assess the performance in the field and in post-harvest storage of this transgenic event (CSI-32) and of four check lines: the non-transformed parental line (IT86D-1010) and three released varieties (SAMPEA 7, SAMPEA 20-T and IT13K-1070-2). Data collected from the field trials comprised plant growth parameters, pest infestations and damage, and grain yield. Harvested grain from each replicated entry was used in a storage assessment of bruchid resistance following artificial infestation with laboratory-reared cowpea weevils. Data were collected on egg oviposition, adult emergence, and grain damage as well as computation of median development period and Dobie's susceptibility index for each entry. Results and discussion: The agronomic performance and phenotypic characteristics of event CSI-32 were very similar to its parental counterpart and the other compared varieties. However, event CSI-32 exhibited complete suppression of weevil emergence and resistance to seed damage over the four-month period of the post-harvest study. Conclusions: This work represents the first field study of genetically modified cowpea expressing the αAI-1 protein. It demonstrates how a biotechnology solution to mitigate significant economic losses during cowpea storage, offers great potential for cowpea improvement programs.

Indexed as

alpha-amylase inhibitorbruchidscowpeagenetic modificationhost plant resistancestorage losses

Identifiers

PMID39649804
PMCPMC11620878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.