Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649788›Full record

ArticleSports medicine and health science2025

Comparison of physiological and psychobiological acute responses between high intensity functional training and high intensity continuous training.

Douglas A T Santos, Naiane S Morais, Ricardo B Viana, Gustavo C T Costa, Marilia S Andrade, Rodrigo L Vancini, Katja Weiss, Beat Knechtle, Claudio A B de Lira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine and health science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Douglas A T SantosColegiado de Educação Física, Universidade do Estado da Bahia, Teixeira de Freitas, Brazil.
Naiane S MoraisSetor de Fisiologia Humana e do Exercício, Laboratório de Avaliação do Movimento Humano, Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Ricardo B VianaInstituto de Educação Física e Esportes, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Gustavo C T CostaNúcleo de Estudo e Pesquisa Avançada em Esporte, Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Marilia S AndradeDepartamento de Fisiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo L VanciniCentro de Educação Física e Desportos, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.
Katja WeissInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Beat KnechtleInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Claudio A B de LiraSetor de Fisiologia Humana e do Exercício, Laboratório de Avaliação do Movimento Humano, Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the physiological and psychobiological responses that occur during and after high intensity functional training (HIFT). We compared physiological and psychobiological responses during and after a HIFT session with a high intensity continuous training (HICT) session. Twenty-one trained and healthy men were submitted to 20-min session of HIFT and HICT on separate days. The heart rate, blood lactate concentration [Lac], levels of state anxiety, rates of perceived exertion (RPE) and perceived discomfort (RPE-D), and affective valence were measured. Exercise intensity of the HICT was adjusted to the mean heart rate obtained in the HIFT session. The highest heart rate in the training sessions was significantly higher in HIFT (mean ​± ​standard deviation [

Indexed as

Borg scaleCrossfit®Heart rateLactate

Identifiers

PMID39649788
PMCPMC11624417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.